I have been having a debate of sorts with Mayesvara for the past few weeks, Here, Here and Here. I wasn’t surprised at what he believed to be true when it came to Gaudiya Vaishnava theology, but I was hoping he would be able to start to think for himself. In my last comment to [...]
Archive for September, 2008
Eyes Wide Shut
Posted in blind faith, tagged hare krishna, prabhupada, srimad bhagavatam on September 26, 2008 | 3 Comments »
Update on the Hridayananda situation
Posted in blind faith, tagged prabhupada, hare krishna, iskcon, sampradaya sun, Hridayananda on September 19, 2008 | 15 Comments »
The Sampradaya Sun has posted an article by Ameyatma Das where he tells people that he has made a video rebuttal of what Hridayananda said about Prabhupada and infallibility. I wrote a post about this topic a while ago called Hridayananda Goswami: “Prabhupada wasn’t perfect”.
In his video rebuttal Ameyatma tells us that sastra claims that [...]
Back to Reality
Posted in blind faith, tagged hare krishna, iskcon, prabhupada on September 18, 2008 | 13 Comments »
This is a reply to a long comment by Mayesvara on the Jiv Jago post:
Clearly your idea of bhakti is based upon the theological idea that there is a strict antagonistic dichotomy between the desire to enjoy and the desire to serve Krishna. This misunderstanding is what I have written a lot about on this [...]
Jiv Jago
Posted in eternal truths, tagged hare krishna, iskcon, narayana maharaja, prabhupada on September 17, 2008 | 39 Comments »
This is a reply to Mayesvara’s comment on the Reality Check post:
The teaching about the desire to enjoy that actually makes sense is that conditioned souls shouldn’t spend their lives solely devoted to seeking enjoyment. There is a higher purpose in life. Not that the desire for enjoyment is bad in and of itself, it [...]
Sripad Narayana Maharaja: The Irony and the Ecstasy
Posted in blind faith, tagged bhagavad gita, hare krishna, narayana maharaja, prabhupada on September 16, 2008 | 29 Comments »
This is a reply to Mayesvara’s comments on the Reality Check post:
Mayesvara, in your comment you said:
So you are saying that Krishna’s words should be understood like this: “Though they be of lower birth, or vaisyas, or sudras or women…” In other words, lower birth is one category of people whilst women are another category [...]